Advisory News Hubb
Advertisement Banner
  • Home
  • Laws & Ethics
  • Financial Advisory
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Laws & Ethics
  • Financial Advisory
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Gourmet News Hubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Laws & Ethics

SCOTUS: Three Potential Patent Cases

admin by admin
October 10, 2022
in Laws & Ethics


At the “long conference” last week, the Supreme Court considered the fate of 13 pending petitions for writ of certiorari.  Three cases have survived. In two, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file an amicus brief “expressing the views of the United States.”

  • Teva v. GSK, 22-37 (Skinny Label)
  • Interactive Wearables v. Polar Electro, 21-1281 (Eligibility)

CVSG.  The SG’s brief typically takes several months to draft and so we’ll likely not see further action in these cases until 2023.

The court took no action in Juno v. Kite, 21-1566 (full scope written description), meaning that the case will be reconsidered at a later conference. The remaining 10 petitions were denied certiorari.

  1. CustomPlay, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., No. 21-1527
  2. Gilbert P. Hyatt v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 21-1526
  3. Worlds Inc. v. Activision Blizzard Inc., No. 21-1554
  4. SawStop Holding LLC v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 22-11
  5. Larry G. Junker v. Medical Components, Inc., No. 22-26
  6. CPC Patent Technologies PTY Ltd. v. Apple Inc., No. 22-38
  7. Ampersand Chowchilla Biomass, LLC, et al. v. United States, No. 22-69
  8. Aaron G. Filler, et al. v. United States, No. 22-53
  9. Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Kronos Incorporated, No. 22-133
  10. Biogen International GmbH, et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 21-1567




Source link

Previous Post

Ex-Fed Chair Bernanke, Two Other U.S. Economists Win Nobel Prize for Bank Research

Next Post

Structuring Your Week To Become A Highly-Leveraged Advisor

Next Post

Structuring Your Week To Become A Highly-Leveraged Advisor

Recommended

DoggyPhone v Furbo | Patently-O

9 months ago

#FA Success Ep 334: Finding Clarity On Fees And Clients By Allowing The Business To Evolve Over Time, With Meg Bartelt

7 days ago

The Reality of Investing in Space Exploration

9 months ago
California v. Texas: Which is Better for Business? [313]

California v. Texas: Which is Better for Business? [313]

8 months ago

Functional Claims: Morse, Halliburton & Amgen

1 month ago

Crafting An Annual Compliance Calendar For A (Solo) RIA: Staying On Top Of Compliance Tasks While Serving Clients

1 month ago
Advisory-(-White-)

© Advisory News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Laws & Ethics
  • Financial Advisory
  • Contact

Newsletter Sign Up.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Laws & Ethics
  • Financial Advisory
  • Contact

© 2022 Advisory News Hubb All rights reserved.