Advisory News Hubb
Advertisement Banner
  • Home
  • Laws & Ethics
  • Financial Advisory
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Laws & Ethics
  • Financial Advisory
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
Gourmet News Hubb
No Result
View All Result
Home Laws & Ethics

Rudy finally gets his Whale

admin by admin
October 14, 2022
in Laws & Ethics


Christopher Rudy filed his fishing hook patent application back in 1988 with a file-wrapper-continuation in 1989.  At the time he was already a patent attorney and so worked his own case.  But, the USPTO offered some resistance.  The BPAI/PTAB issued three different opinions on record, and the Federal Circuit also issued a 2020 decision holding that some of the claims were directed to the unpatentable abstract of “selecting a fishing hook based upon observed water conditions.”  In re Rudy, 956 F.3d 1379 (Fed. Cir. 2020). Back on remand, Rudy cancelled the offending claims and finally received his U.S. Patent No. 11,406,092.  As a pre-GATT patent, the term should last for 17-years from issuance.  That makes a pretty good run going forward: the patent will issue 51 years after its original filing date.  This is the first pre-GATT patent issued since 2020.  Over the past five years, the Office has issued about 25 (none to Gil Hyatt). A number of these were held in abeyance due to DOD Secrecy Orders. As far as I know, the only one being litigated is 9,674,560 owned by Personalized Media Communications.

= = =

Rudy’s basic discovery was that fishing-lure selection is not a one-size-fits-all situation.  He particularly noted that factors such as water-clarity and light intensity at fishing depth will impact lure color selection.  The patent includes a nice table:

The recently issued patent includes a number of apparatus and method claims.  My favorite is No. 16, which claims a surefire method for catching a fish.

16. A method to catch fish, comprising steps of

(1) observing clarity of water to be fished to determine whether the water is clear, stained or muddy,

(2) measuring light transmittance at a depth in the water where a fishing hook is to be placed, and then

(3) selecting a color of the fishing hook to be used by matching the observed water conditions ((1) and (2)) with a color [from the table above]

then attaching the selected hook to a fishing line,

then placing the attached, selected hook in the depth in the water where fishing is to take place,

and then catching the fish with the attached, selected hook,

wherein the fishing hook used is disintegrated from but is otherwise connectable to a fishing lure or other tackle and has a shaft portion, a bend portion connected to the shaft portion, and a barb or point at the terminus of the bend, and wherein the fishing hook used is made of a suitable material, which permits transmittance of light therethrough and is colored.

US-11406092-B1.  The nice thing about Rudy’s claim here is that you only owe a royalty if you actually catch a fish.



Source link

Previous Post

What to Expect in the Markets Next Week

Next Post

Powerful Social Media Tips and Tools For Financial Advisors

Next Post

Powerful Social Media Tips and Tools For Financial Advisors

Recommended

5 Tax Breaks Overlooked by Small Business Owners

3 months ago

What Is the Size of the Average Retirement Nest Egg?

5 months ago

5 Tax Strategies for a Bonus or Windfall

3 weeks ago

Weekend Reading For Financial Planners (Sept 10-11) 2022

5 months ago

The Impact of Defaulting on a Student Loan

5 months ago

American Express Launches New Offers on Hilton Cards

5 months ago

Advisory-(-White-)

© 2022 Advisory News Hubb All rights reserved.

Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions.

Navigate Site

  • Home
  • Laws & Ethics
  • Financial Advisory
  • Contact

Newsletter Sign Up.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Laws & Ethics
  • Financial Advisory
  • Contact

© 2022 Advisory News Hubb All rights reserved.