If you were to craft the perfect investment, you would probably want its attributes to include high returns and low risk.
The reality, of course, is that this kind of investment is next to impossible to find. Not surprisingly, people spend a lot of time developing methods and strategies that come close to the “perfect investment.” But none have been as popular as modern portfolio theory (MPT).
Here, we look at the basic ideas behind MPT, its pros and cons, and how it should factor into your portfolio management.
- Modern portfolio theory (MPT) argues that it’s possible to design an ideal portfolio that will provide the investor maximum returns by taking on the optimal amount of risk.
- MPT was developed by economist Harry Markowitz in the 1950s; his theories surround the importance of portfolios, risk, diversification, and the connections between different kinds of securities.
- In particular, MPT advocates diversification of securities and asset classes or the benefits of not putting all your eggs in one basket.
- MPT says stocks face both systematic risk—market risks such as interest rates and recessions—as well as unsystematic risk—issues that are specific to each stock, such as management changes or poor sales.
- Proper diversification of a portfolio can’t prevent systematic risk, but it can dampen, if not eliminate, unsystematic risk.
One of the most important and influential economic theories dealing with finance and investment, MPT was developed by Harry Markowitz and published under the title “Portfolio Selection” in the Journal of Finance in 1952.
The theory is based on Markowitz’s hypothesis that it is possible for investors to design an optimal portfolio to maximize returns by taking on a quantifiable amount of risk. Essentially, investors can reduce risk through diversification using a quantitative method.
Modern portfolio theory says that it is not enough to look at the expected risk and return of one particular stock. By investing in more than one stock, an investor can reap the benefits of diversification—chief among them, a reduction in the riskiness of the portfolio. MPT quantifies the benefits of diversification, or not putting all of your eggs in one basket.
For most investors, the risk they take when they buy a stock is that the return will be lower than expected. In other words, it is the deviation from the average return. Each stock has its own standard deviation from the mean, which modern portfolio theory calls “risk.”
The risk in a portfolio of diverse individual stocks will be less than the risk inherent in holding any one of the individual stocks, provided the risks of the various stocks are not directly related. Consider a portfolio that holds two risky stocks: one that pays off when it rains and another that pays off when it doesn’t rain. A portfolio that contains both assets will always pay off, regardless of whether it rains or shines. Adding one risky asset to another can reduce the overall risk of an all-weather portfolio.
In other words, Markowitz showed that investment is not just about picking stocks, but about choosing the right combination of stocks among which to distribute one’s nest egg.
Markowitz, along with Merton H. Miller and William F. Sharpe, changed the way people invested; for their life’s work, the three shared the 1990 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences.
Kinds of Risk
Modern portfolio theory states that the risk for individual stock returns has two components:
Unsystematic Risk: Also known as “specific risk,” this risk is specific to individual stocks, such as a change in management or a decline in operations. This kind of risk can be diversified away as you increase the number of stocks in your portfolio (see the figure below). It represents the component of a stock’s return that is not correlated with general market moves.
For a well-diversified portfolio, the risk—or average deviation from the mean—of each stock contributes little to portfolio risk. Instead, it is the difference—or covariance—between individual stocks’ levels of risk that determines overall portfolio risk. As a result, investors benefit from holding diversified portfolios instead of individual stocks.
The Efficient Frontier
Now that we understand the benefits of diversification, the question of how to identify the best level of diversification arises. Enter the efficient frontier.
For every level of return, there is one portfolio that offers the lowest possible risk, and for every level of risk, there is a portfolio that offers the highest return. These combinations can be plotted on a graph, and the resulting line is the efficient frontier. The figure below shows the efficient frontier for just two stocks—a high risk/high return technology stock (like Google) and a low risk/low return consumer stock (like Coca-Cola).
Any portfolio that lies on the upper part of the curve is efficient: It gives the maximum expected return for a given level of risk. A rational investor will only ever hold a portfolio that lies somewhere on the efficient frontier. The maximum level of risk that the investor will take on determines the position of the portfolio on the line.
Modern portfolio theory takes this idea even further. It suggests that combining a stock portfolio that sits on the efficient frontier with a risk-free asset, the purchase of which is funded by borrowing, can actually increase returns beyond the efficient frontier. In other words, if you were to borrow to acquire a risk-free stock, then the remaining stock portfolio could have a riskier profile and, therefore, a higher return than you might otherwise choose.
When a portfolio is well-balanced, the individual risk of each stock has little impact on overall portfolio risk; rather, it’s the difference between each stock’s level of risk that influences the overall portfolio risk.
What MPT Means for You
Modern portfolio theory has had a marked impact on how investors perceive risk, return, and portfolio management. The theory demonstrates that portfolio diversification can reduce investment risk. In fact, modern money managers routinely follow its precepts. Passive investing also incorporates MPT as investors choose index funds that are low cost and well-diversified. Losses in any individual stock are not material enough to damage performance due to the diversification, and the success and prevalence of passive investing is an indication of the ubiquity of modern portfolio theory.
Downsides to MPT
As ubiquitous as MPT might be, it still has some shortcomings in the real world. For starters, it often requires investors to rethink notions of risk. Sometimes it demands that the investor take on a perceived risky investment (futures, for example) in order to reduce overall risk. That can be a tough sell to an investor not familiar with the benefits of sophisticated portfolio management techniques.
Furthermore, MPT assumes that it is possible to select stocks whose individual performance is independent of other investments in the portfolio. But market historians have shown that there are no such instruments. In times of market stress, seemingly independent investments do act as though they are related.
Likewise, it is logical to borrow to hold a risk-free asset and increase your portfolio returns, but finding a truly risk-free asset is another matter. Government-backed bonds are presumed to be risk-free, but, in reality, they are not. Securities such as gilts and U.S. Treasury bonds are free of default risk, but expectations of higher inflation and interest rate changes can both affect their value.
Then there is the question of the number of stocks required for diversification. How many is enough? Mutual funds can contain dozens and dozens of stocks. Investment guru William J. Bernstein says that even 100 stocks are not enough to diversify away the unsystematic risk. By contrast, Edwin J. Elton and Martin J. Gruber in their book Modern Portfolio Theory And Investment Analysis (1981), conclude that you would come very close to achieving optimal diversity after adding the 20th stock.
The Bottom Line
The gist of MPT is that the market is hard to beat and that the people who beat the market are those who take on above-average risk. It is also implied that these risk-takers will get their comeuppance when markets turn down.
Then again, investors such as Warren Buffett remind us that portfolio theory is just that—theory. At the end of the day, a portfolio’s success rests on the investor’s skills and the time that they devote to it. Sometimes it is better to pick a small number of out-of-favor investments and wait for the market to turn in your favor than to rely on market averages alone.